Don't watch "The Company Men" when you're 'in-between' jobs. Nothing to do with making you more demoralized or anything like that. It's just not a very good movie. It's full of whingey business types who think they're owed a (very high standard of) living by The Man. And then they get to indulge a hard-hat wearing, toolbelt-toting, Kevin Costner-baiting, blue-collar-having fetish. Because that's real work, that's honest work. Anyway, don't watch it: that's my advice.
Now I've been offered a job, I thought I'd write about one of the more difficult aspects of working as a .Net developer: not working as a .Net developer.
'Unemployed' is a vague term: there's unemployed, and there's finished a contract, gone to Greece, came home 3 weeks later, and looking for either contract or full-time work. So I don't know if the word 'unemployed' is a fitting term when I knew in all likelihood I was simply in-between jobs.
So what term would I use? Job lurking? Maybe. When I went for lunch with my working friends in the city recently I felt like a creepy old guy in a chat room full of giggling teenagers, pretending to be one of them, watching but not saying anything.
I'm the pigOne thing that surprised me was the flakiness and indecision of some of the places I interviewed in. I learned that you can't expect the courtesy of a definite response from some companies. When you explain to the guys who interview you that yes, you found the place ok, having taken two busses to get there, then it seems to me the minimum of common decency that they might make good on their promise to let you know soon one way or the other after the interview, but this wasn't always the case. A company whose website says 'Our Core Values: Professionalism... ' but who themselves won't say 'The last guy came back so we don't need you', 'We ran out of money' or that old chestnut 'We think you're shithouse' to your face is a big fat liar.
And don't harass your recruitment agent: they're just as pissed off as you are. Actually, they're about 15% as pissed off as you are, to be precise. It's a chicken and pig breakfast situation.
I'm lovin' itGet out of the house! I don't care if it's full of bogans and kids, +1 to @McDonalds for providing free wifi. Go there in the mornin' and you'll see all these people surfin', phonin', drinkin' coffee - it's a digital hub in your local McCafé. I used to go there with my Android Xoom to do some blogging, catch up on some feeds, and of course vainly try to become mayor.
UpgradeDevs are always complaining about how they can't use the latest tech, can't use MVC3, can't use Entity Framework, can't use jQuery. It's just not used where they work, and they can't go changing everything to keep up with Scott Gu. But I could. I upgraded my site to .Net 4, upgraded my IDE from the laughably archaic Visual Studio 2008 first to Visual Web Developer 2010 Express, and when I realised that that was incompatible with ReSharper 6, which I had also upgraded to, I upgraded to Visual Studio 2010. Such is the importance of ReSharper to me nowadays, that had I realised in the first place that Web Developer 2010 didn't support it I wouldn't have bothered installing it. In the end I only stopped upgrading because I ran out of things to upgrade.
BrandAs an unemployed failure your brand does take a bit of a hit, so work on it. In my case I got back into blogging. It's not directly going to help you get a job, but it gives the impression of movement, which in the circumstances is very important.
And go and meet people: even in this day and age it's important to get in and meet the agents face-to-face who are trying to get you work. I met some really nice people - Michael and Tom at Hays, Thomas and Leisa at Zenus. Showing up in person seems to matter to them too. It's nice to know that some old-fashioned niceties still apply. Of course, virtual introductions on LinkedIn still matter too, and I can attest to the power of these. Out of the blue I got a few credible offers leading to interviews purely, from what I can gather, on the basis of Linked In.
A predictionHere's a prediction: even though my Careers 2.0 profile has been about as productive for me as the habanero plant in my back garden, I predict that will soon change and that the Stack Exchange tidal wave will reach these shores and change both the way we advertise ourselves as devs and how recruiters and clients assess us. Technical questions are part of any job interview. I actually enjoy that part of the process, and of the 5 interviews I did 3 of them involved being asked tech questions although thankfully none of the experiences was as humbling as the one I had at Zap Technologies 4 years ago.
But CVs and LinkedIn can't give an evidence-based evaluation of what you've done or are interested in. Careers 2.0 can, insofar as it links your account to StackOverflow and a bunch of other similar sites. There's absolutely no point in setting up an account there unless you have stackexchange sites to tie it to. And I predict that that particular careers site will become more important in the next couple of years.
Being unemployed's ok. Seriously. I'll miss it.